Tag: Wurst

Priscilla Kennedy & Anthony Wurst

Start The Day In Prayer

TBA – pending team conference. Sketchbook:

If you have been to a Tuesday Chapel Service, chances are you saw our team making an announcement encouraging the student body to start the day in prayer. If not that, hopefully you saw some of our signs on the bulletin boards around campus. This was an engineered & measured persuasive campaign. In our presentation, we will be sharing the results of the campaign, what we wished we could have done differently and what we thought went well. Please stop by our booth to find out about the social science theories we employed in executing this campaign and discuss the campaign with us. We hope that you were encouraged in your faith by our campaign!

COMM 450, Persuasion

Doyle Srader

L203

10 AM – Noon

Return to schedule

Anthony Wurst

Death Penalty Appeals

Have you ever wondered what death row inmates can do to appeal their sentences? Have you ever wondered what it is like for a death row inmate to go through the process of appeals? Are you curious about the process by which death row inmates appeal their sentence in Oregon state? If so this would be a good talk for you. Using the  one of teh most heinous current inmates as a backdrop, we discuss the situational, organizational and environmental context of death row appeals. We will discuss two particular appeals in some depth. We identify and offer a solution for the most significant problem currently associated with death row appeals. The entire talk is designed to facilitate discussion, so it would be great to have your input. Please come and bring your questions. This might be fun 🙂

CJ 210, Introduction to Criminal Justice

Brian Humphreys

P103

3 – 3:30 PM

Return to schedule

Anthony Wurst

Enuma Elish v Genesis: A Lesson From The Maori & Alutiiq

It has been asserted by some that Genesis owes compositional influence to the Mesopotamian creation epic, Enuma Elish. This talk will argue that the unbiased interpreter of evidence would be more convinced that the two creation epics are divergent editions of a shared memory. In support, we explore the historical & logical grounds for the assertion of inter-influence as well as expert opinion on the issue. This essay culminates in an exemplary model of recording a shared memory from indigenous peoples of the Pacific Rim. Taking these together reveals bias in the trend of modern scholarship on the issue.

HIST 370, Ancient Near Eastern & Mediterranean Civilizations

Melisa Ortiz Berry

P103

1 – 3 PM

Return to schedule

Jacob Lilley & Anthony Wurst

2021 Bushnell debate championship

Topic: Serving in the military violates Biblical teaching.

Affirmative: Anthony Wurst

Negative: Jacob Lilley

The winner will be decided by audience vote, and will be crowned the 2021 Bushnell debate champion.

COMM 325, Argumentation and Debate

Doyle Srader

L203

Click he ere to view the live stream

11 AM – Noon

Return to schedule

Anthony Wurst

Successful Argumentation in Prayer to God

Should we present arguments before God in prayer? I believe that our prayer life can be enriched by offering argumentative prayers as taught in the scriptures. Dr. Srader has a unit in his Argumentation and Debate course on why we should use argumentation in prayer. In it, he offers three examples of stories from the Bible where successful argumentatuve prayers that convince God to change His mind are offered. To expand this teaching, I presented Dr. Srader with another such example in the story of Abraham. I suggested this as an example of argumentative prayer which convinced God to change His mind as he argued for the lives of the righteous in Sodom and Gomorrah. In this talk I will present what Dr. Srader had before my suggested addition. Next, I chronicle our conversations on the issue, which were argumentative. I then discuss how Abraham’s form of argumentation with God fits into Dr. Srader’s definition of an argument, and we crescendo by practicing. I will offer an argumentative prayer asking God to help us to lead a meaningful life based on John 15:12-17. Then we will discuss the talk together.

COMM 325, Argumentation and Debate

Doyle Srader

L203

Click here to view the live stream

1 – 1:30 PM

Return to schedule

Anthony Wurst

The 60s Student Movement: Ignoring Marxist Evil on Display

During the 1960s, many key formative movements happened in the life of our nation. One such movement was the communist student movement. In this project, I explored the communist student movement by attempting to answer the following question, “Didn’t the students of the 1960s know that communism was a catalyst for hundreds of millions of deaths and countlesss other human rights offenses?” In answering this query, we might speak in defense of the students that the former attempts at communism “did not do it right”, and further that the students would not have had access to real time information about the ills of Mao and Khrushchev during their time. But the evidence suggests that these are false assumptions. I reveal in this project some of the most prominent voices in the communist student movement of the 1960s to show what the students were being taught about commmunism. I then reveal some blaring, prominent, credible, and easily accessible sources of information on the contemporary ills of communism that the students should have used to respond in rejecting those teachings. I discuss the question of how this could have happened then, what we can learn from this dilemna and what encouragement the Bible has for us today on this subject. To finish, I welcome critical feedback and discussion.

HIST 317, Studies in American History: The 1960s

Melisa Ortiz Berry

Bushnell History Symposium, P103

Join by Zoom

9:30 AM – Noon

Return to schedule

Anthony Wurst

May The Strong Protect The Innocent

In his inaugural address, president John F. Kennedy promoted, “creating a new endeavor, not a new balance of power, but a new world of law, where the strong are just and the weak secure and the peace preserved.”  The protection of indigenous peoples is a key measure by which the progress of modern society should be judged.  Non-Industrialized, indigenous peoples cannot defend themselves against the industrial military machines of modern society.  Therefore, by means of constructivist mechanisms, the popular morals and ethics of advanced military societies decide upon the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples.  Constructivist approaches to international relations assert the power of groups to socialize the international community to new norms.  Recent scholarship states that constructivist “[b]eliefs about [c]hange”  in the international community are that change is “[p]ossible through socialization, diffusion of ideas, or internationalization of norms.”   Before it reaches the international level, this change begins in the hearts of the people.  The genesis of absolute, universally beneficial change is revealed to humankind by the Holy Spirit as taught by the scriptures in Romans 2:14,15 .  Has this mechanism of socialization provided enduring protection for the indigenous peoples whose rights have been infringed by the world’s greatest military machine, the USA?  In this essay, three court cases will be used to compare constructivist socializing of new norms between 1824 and 2017 with realist counterpoints.  We hope to prove that, though constructivism has yielded inconsistent results in protecting the rights of indigenous peoples, it has provided significant protection.  While current academic literature suggests constructivist mechanisms are effective in socializing groups to new norms, a comparison of three court cases involving the US and indigenous peoples reveals constructivism has provided significant yet inconsistent protection, as seen through an examination of Johnson v. M’Intosh, Worcester v. Georgia and Republic of Marshall v. USA.

HIST 430, History of American International Relations

Melisa Ortiz Berry

Bushnell History Symposium, P103

10 AM – 1 PM

Return to schedule